What was Reese thinking? If movies had a scent, This Means War would "reek of cheap cologne," says Mary Pols in TIME. The "hyper saturated color and lighting scheme" makes everyone look bad, both FDR and Tuck are casually misogynistic, and even the promising pairing of "ladylike Oscar winner" Witherspoon with "foul-mouthed late night comedy queen" Chelsea Handler falls flat. Still, "the one to worry about is Reese Witherspoon." She's better than "immature garbage like this." Could she not "smell disaster?"
"Who is the victor in This Means War? Not the viewer"
Let Witherspoon have some fun: Is the movie "totally frothy"? Yes, says Leah Rozen at The Wrap. But "that’s a good thing, at least here." In this deliberately un-ponderous "adult version of Mad magazine's venerable Spy vs. Spy feature," Witherspoon "gives a likable performance, always impressing as just a little smarter and more competent than either of her swains." Sure, This Means War isn't Oscar bait, but at a time when Hollywood seems to have lost the knack of making "glossy, light-hearted fare," it's shamelessly entertaining.
"Spy vs. Spy love triangle makes peace with its frothiness"
Witherspoon has to pay the bills somehow: Like any good romantic comedy, the movie "is full of longing looks, tender touches, and deep professions of eternal love," says Stephen Whitty in New Jersey's The Star-Ledger. "Unfortunately, they all pass between Pine and Hardy." It's a little embarrassing seeing Witherspoon play "such a disposable character," but that's what she signed up for. She may have won an Oscar for a biopic, but "rom-coms pay her bills, and if taking parts like this keep her in the game," who can blame her?
"This Means War: A bromantic comedy"
View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week
Other stories from this section:
Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Sign-up for Daily Newsletter