Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn rights. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn rights. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Sáu, 17 tháng 2, 2012

Rights Group Says Libya's Militias Are 'Out of Control'

The Libyan government has been unable to control groups of armed men, many of them former rebels who fought to oust Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi last year and who now commit crimes with impunity, operate detention facilities outside the reach of the law and regularly engage in torture and revenge attacks, according to a report by Amnesty International released on Thursday.

As my colleague Anthony Shadid reported from Tripoli last week, the powerlessness of the government is such that the national army is treated like just another armed group. As a result, Libya’s leaders have been unable to rein in the large number of lawless militias with regional or tribal allegiances who fight one another with disturbing frequency. Human Rights Watch has estimated that there are 250 separate militias in the coastal city of Misurata alone.

In its 45-page report, Amnesty International accused militiamen of broad human rights abuses against those who are suspected of being loyalists of the deposed leader. In addition to revenge attacks and the forced displacement of certain groups, the report described the torture of those in unofficial detention:

In January and early February 2012, Amnesty International delegates interviewed scores of victims of torture who were held in and around Tripoli, al-Zawiya, Gharyan, Misratah, and Sirte, as well as several families of people who died in the custody of militias after they were tortured. Detainees told Amnesty International that they had been suspended in contorted positions; beaten for hours with whips, cables, plastic hoses, metal chains and bars, and wooden sticks; and given electric shocks with live wires and taser-like electro-shock weapons.

At least 12 detainees have died since September while in detention by militias or in a hospital shortly after being released, the group said.

Sub-Saharan Africans appeared to have been targeted for arrest and abuse, according to the report. “When Amnesty International delegates visited Ain Zara Prison in January 2012, about 400 out of approximately 900 detainees were foreign nationals, mainly from sub-Saharan Africa,” the group said of a prison in Tripoli that was under the control of local fighters.

The rights group urged the Libyan government to do more to stop the vigilante violence by militiamen and to establish a trained security force, close unofficial detention centers and investigate torture and other crimes against detainees.

Their calls echoed similar pleas by other rights advocates in recent weeks, including Human Rights Watch, which this month called on Libya’s leaders to “show the political will to prosecute people who commit serious crimes, regardless of their role in the uprising.”


View the original article here

Thứ Tư, 8 tháng 2, 2012

Do whales have civil rights?

When it comes to the constitutional amendment banning slavery, PETA argues that orcas are people, too

Chalk up another PR coup for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. The animal rights group is grabbing headlines once again — this time with a lawsuit naming five killer whales as plaintiffs, and arguing that the marine mammals deserve the same constitutional protection from "slavery" as people. Are whales really entitled to human rights? Here, a brief guide to this unusual civil rights case:

Who are PETA and the whales suing?
SeaWorld. The whales named in the lawsuit — Tilikum, Katina, Corky, Kasatka, and Ulises — perform at SeaWorld's Orlando and San Diego locations. PETA says that by keeping orcas in captivity, the marine park is violating the U.S. Constitution's 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery and involuntary servitude.

SEE MORE: Are 12-foot pythons devouring the wildlife in the Florida Everglades? 

What does SeaWorld say?
Basically, that this is crazy. SeaWorld's attorney, Theodore Shaw, says if PETA were to prevail in what he says is a frivolous lawsuit, the ruling could be used to ruin other marine parks, zoos, and pet businesses. It could even be used to go after pet owners, or even police who use sniffer dogs to detect bombs and drugs. "We're talking about hell unleashed," Shaw says.

Does PETA have a case?
SeaWorld has asked a federal judge to dismiss the case. U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Miller held a one-hour hearing Monday to consider whether the lawsuit — filed by PETA, three marine-mammal experts, and two former SeaWorld trainers — should go any farther. Jeffrey Kerr, the lawyer representing the five whales, says even that was a victory. "For the first time in our nation's history," Kerr says, "a federal court heard arguments as to whether living, breathing, feeling beings have rights and can be enslaved simply because they happen to not have been born human." Miller says he'll issue a ruling soon.

SEE MORE: Discovered: Antarctica's underwater 'lost world'

Will the judge buy it?
Probably not. During the hearing, Miller told Kerr that he couldn't find a legal precedent for letting humans file a lawsuit on behalf of the whales. The judge also suggested he didn't agree with PETA's argument that SeaWorld is being "hysterical" by saying the case, if successful, could lead to a barrage of lawsuits on behalf of pets and police dogs. "Call me hysterical," Judge Miller said, "but that's one of the first places I went in my thinking about this case."

Sources: BBC News, LA Times, Telegraph

View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week

Other stories from this topic:

Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

View the original article here